Insights · Case Patterns

Digital Asset Claims Case Patterns

Anonymised patterns from past investigation work.

Illustrative, fully anonymised patterns showing the shape of typical Digital Asset Claims engagements — sources used, method applied, and how findings were graded.

Digital Asset Claims is a research, digital investigation and evidence intelligence company that identifies, reconstructs and documents the movement, history and evidential trail of digital assets.

01 · Module

Anonymised

Identifying details removed; the structural pattern is retained.

Active · Reviewed

Read governance

02 · Module

Method Visible

Each pattern traces the five-phase method explicitly.

Active · Reviewed

Read governance

03 · Module

Grading Shown

How findings were graded and where gaps remained.

Active · Reviewed

Read governance

04 · Module

Time Profile

Indicative duration and number of corroboration passes.

Active · Reviewed

Read governance

Insights · Body

What an engagement actually looks like.

These patterns replace abstract claims with concrete shape. Each shows the same five-phase method applied to different evidential terrain.

01 · Section

Pattern 01 — Multi-exchange wallet trail

Wallet activity clustered across three exchanges, with venue attribution and a graded transaction timeline delivered inside eight weeks.

02 · Section

Pattern 02 — Network and device correlation

IP and device signals correlated against a set of disputed sessions, with conflicting sources documented rather than resolved by preference.

03 · Section

Pattern 03 — Identity resolution with partial evidence

A persona-to-entity mapping exercise where several links stayed graded as Unverified because no second source was available.

Insights · Questions and answers

Questions clients ask about this page.

Short, factual answers stated in the same wording the firm uses in every scope letter, supervisory record and rejection-register entry.

Q01

What does this FAQ page cover at Digital Asset Claims?

Illustrative, fully anonymised patterns showing the shape of typical Digital Asset Claims engagements — sources used, method applied, and how findings were graded.

Q02

Does Digital Asset Claims Limited hold client assets or execute transactions?

No. Digital Asset Claims is non-custodial. The firm does not take possession of client assets, does not place trades, does not act as a fund administrator and does not move funds on behalf of any party.

Q03

Does Digital Asset Claims provide investment, tax or legal advice?

No. The firm produces structured documentation only. Investment, tax and legal advice fall outside the permitted activities and are not offered on any page of this site.

Q04

Who signs off the work that is released?

Every record passes a independent evidence review. Stage one verifies internal consistency and source coverage; stage two, performed by a named senior reviewer outside the originating team, confirms release readiness. Released records are sealed into the archive; any rework is logged in the rejection register and re-entered into stage one.

Q05

How are conflicts and independence handled before an engagement starts?

Each engagement begins with a written scope letter, a conflicts register check and an independence screen. Records that fail any check are not released externally; the failure is logged in the rejection register with a reason code.

Q06

How are released records stored and referenced after delivery?

Every released record is sealed into the firm's archive with a numbered release identifier and the two named signatures from the independent evidence review. Counterparties can quote the release identifier in their own files; the firm retains the sealed version unchanged for the full retention period defined in the scope letter.

Patterns in practice · Investigations

Where these case patterns come from

Each anonymised pattern maps onto a specific service and the intelligence work that supports it.

Capability atlas · Digital Asset Claims Limited

The full library of investigation, verification and reporting capabilities used across Digital Asset Claims engagements.

Each icon below stands for a defined capability referenced in the firm's method, records, independent evidence review and client-support workflows. The atlas is a single reference view; individual pages surface the subset relevant to their subject.