NODE · LON-01|LONDON --:--:--
DAC | Digital Asset Claims
Intelligence · Entity Mapping

Digital Asset Claims Entity Mapping

Linking addresses, accounts and structures into one relationship map

Entity mapping consolidates the outputs of OSINT research, infrastructure intelligence and on-chain tracing into a single structured map of relationships — which wallets, accounts, domains, companies and individuals appear connected, and on what specific evidence each connection rests.

What the map records

Nodes and edge evidence

Each entity — a wallet, a company, a domain, a person — is a node. Each connection between two nodes is an edge, and every edge carries a citation to the specific evidence that produced it: a transaction hash, a registry filing, a shared IP block or a matched identifier. Edges without a recorded source are not added to the map.

Confidence weighting

Connections are labelled by strength — a shared corporate director is weighted differently from a reused email address, which is weighted differently from a direct on-chain transfer between two addresses. The map keeps these distinctions visible rather than flattening them into a single "connected" label.

Cluster identification

Groups of nodes that share multiple independent connection types are flagged as a cluster — a candidate single controlling party or coordinated group — for further corroboration rather than immediate conclusion.

Method

The map is built and reviewed using the same evidence graph tooling described under Technology, and every cluster identified is checked through evidence verification before it is summarised in a case report.

Limitations

A relationship map shows correlation, not legal control. Wallet addresses alone do not establish legal ownership, and shared infrastructure or metadata does not, by itself, prove that two nodes are controlled by the same person. Clusters are reported with their supporting evidence and confidence level so a reader can assess the strength of each connection independently.

Related pages