NODE · LON-01|LONDON --:--:--
DAC | Digital Asset Claims
Evidence Reporting

Digital Asset Claims Digital Asset Evidence Reports

Digital Asset Evidence Reports convert technical findings into a structured report with timelines, transaction paths, evidence references, supporting records, unresolved gaps and analytical conclusions, written for review by the client and any professional adviser instructed on the matter.

Numbered exhibit index and graded findings assembled into an evidence report
Start an Investigation Explore Our Methodology

Why Findings Fail At The Point Of Delivery

Investigative work is frequently lost at the last step. A folder of exports, screenshots and notes may contain everything, yet a solicitor, insurer or regulator cannot read it, cite it or test it, so it carries no weight where it matters.

A report exists to close that gap. It has to be readable by a non-technical decision maker and verifiable by a technical reviewer at the same time, without either audience being asked to take a finding on trust.

Scope Of Reporting Work

This is the closing stage of most Digital Asset Claims engagements: taking the outputs of one or more prior services — transaction reconstructions, origin analysis, OSINT research, infrastructure intelligence, relationship maps, verification results — and assembling them into a single, coherent, structured report.

The report presents a chronological timeline of the matter as evidenced, the transaction paths and relationships established during the engagement, an index of every supporting record and its source, and a set of analytical conclusions written to distinguish clearly between what the evidence establishes and what it does not.

Timeline and Transaction Path Presentation

Events are presented in chronological order with their supporting evidence reference attached to each entry, and transaction paths are presented as a readable narrative alongside the underlying technical data, so the report serves both a general reader and a technical reviewer.

Evidence Reference Index

Every factual statement in the report is tied to a numbered reference in a supporting index, so any claim in the report can be traced back to the specific record, source and confidence classification behind it.

Inputs Assembled Before Drafting

The findings from whichever prior Digital Asset Claims services were engaged, or, where the client already holds their own documented material, that material together with a clear statement of the question the report needs to address.

How A Report Is Built And Checked

Findings are drawn together into a single narrative, each claim is checked against its underlying evidence reference before inclusion, gaps and unresolved questions are stated explicitly in their own section rather than smoothed over, and the final report is reviewed for internal consistency before release.

What The Client Receives

A single structured report combining narrative, timeline, transaction paths, evidence index, unresolved-gaps statement and analytical conclusions, delivered in a form suitable for the client's own use or for handover to a professional adviser.

What A Report Will Not Assert

The report documents and organises evidence; it is not legal advice, does not determine legal ownership or liability, and does not guarantee any particular outcome from any subsequent process the client or their advisers may pursue. Analytical conclusions are stated in terms of evidential support, using the same confidence classifications applied throughout the engagement.

Technology

Technology Applied To Report Production

  • Structured exhibit indexing

    Every artefact is assigned a stable exhibit number referenced consistently throughout the report.

  • Source citation binding

    Each finding is bound to the exhibits that support it, so no assertion floats unsupported.

  • Deterministic re-verification data

    Hashes, block heights, URLs and retrieval times are included so a reviewer can repeat the check.

  • Versioned document control

    Report versions are controlled and dated so later amendments are visible rather than silent.

Data

Material Assembled Into A Report

  • Reconstructed transaction paths with their hashes and block heights
  • Wallet origin and clustering findings
  • Open-source collection items with retrieval timestamps
  • Infrastructure and registration records
  • Entity map nodes, edges and edge provenance
  • Verification outcomes for each supplied document
  • Recorded conflicts, gaps and explicit non-findings

How A Report Is Produced

  1. Step 01

    Confirm the audience

    The intended reader determines structure, depth and the level of technical annexe required.

  2. Step 02

    Assemble the exhibits

    All artefacts are numbered and indexed before any narrative is written.

  3. Step 03

    Write findings against exhibits

    Each finding is drafted with its supporting exhibit references attached.

  4. Step 04

    Grade every finding

    The confidence classification is applied finding by finding, not to the report as a whole.

  5. Step 05

    State gaps and conflicts

    What could not be established is written into the report rather than omitted.

  6. Step 06

    Independent internal review

    A second reviewer re-checks findings against exhibits before release.

  7. Step 07

    Release under version control

    The report is issued dated and versioned, with any later amendment recorded.

Deliverables

Output 01

Structured Evidence Report

Full narrative report combining timeline, transaction paths and analytical conclusions.

Output 02

Evidence Reference Index

Numbered index tying every claim in the report to its supporting source.

Output 03

Unresolved Gaps Statement

Explicit section listing questions the available evidence could not answer.

Output 04

Handover Pack

Supporting records and files organised for review by the client's own professional advisers.

Evidence Confidence Classification

Every finding is graded so that what is established, what is indicative and what remains unresolved are never presented as the same thing.

Verified
Independently confirmed by two or more unrelated sources.
Strongly Supported
Consistent with multiple sources, with no material contradiction observed.
Partially Supported
Consistent with at least one source, but corroboration is incomplete.
Unverified
Recorded as observed, but no independent corroborating source has been located.
Conflicting
Sources disagree, and the conflict is documented rather than resolved by assumption.
Insufficient Evidence
Available material does not support a finding in either direction.

Limitations of This Service

Findings are bounded by the material that is lawfully available at the time of the engagement. Digital Asset Claims does not access private accounts, credentials or systems, does not perform any unauthorised or intrusive technical activity, and does not guarantee that a given question can be answered. Where the evidence does not support a conclusion, the report says so rather than inferring one. The report is a structured evidential document. It does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice, and it does not determine legal ownership, liability or any other legal outcome.

Questions

Is the final report a legal document?

It is a structured evidential report, not legal advice. Clients are free to share it with their own solicitor or other adviser for their own purposes.

What happens to unresolved questions in the report?

They are stated explicitly in their own section rather than omitted or glossed over, so the reader knows precisely what remains open.

Can the report be updated if new material becomes available?

Yes. A report can be revisited and extended if new, lawfully obtained material is provided that bears on the matter under examination.

Need findings in a form your adviser can actually use?

Tell us who has to read the report and what decision it must support. The structure is set from there.

Request A Report Scope