TODO_VERIFY registered office
The registered and operating address of Digital Asset Claims Limited will be published here once confirmed.
Digital Asset Claims is based in the United Kingdom and researches digital asset trails that frequently cross exchange, custodian and network boundaries in multiple countries.
A single operating base rather than a network of local offices.
Case material is held on UK-hosted infrastructure with controlled access.
Blockchain and network evidence is rarely confined to one jurisdiction; the method accounts for that.
Investigations are scoped in writing before any cross-border source is queried.
A digital asset trail can cross dozens of jurisdictions in a single transaction chain. Being clear about where the firm itself is based keeps the engagement boundary legible to clients and reviewers alike.
The registered and operating address of Digital Asset Claims Limited will be published here once confirmed.
Working files and evidence archives are held on UK-hosted infrastructure under role-based access.
Public blockchain records, lawful OSINT sources and infrastructure data are examined regardless of where they originate; the scope of each case states which sources are in play.
Short, factual answers stated in the same wording the firm uses in every scope letter, supervisory record and rejection-register entry.
Digital Asset Claims is based in the United Kingdom and researches digital asset trails that frequently cross exchange, custodian and network boundaries in multiple countries.
No. Digital Asset Claims is non-custodial. The firm does not take possession of client assets, does not place trades, does not act as a fund administrator and does not move funds on behalf of any party.
No. The firm produces structured documentation only. Investment, tax and legal advice fall outside the permitted activities and are not offered on any page of this site.
Every record passes a independent evidence review. Stage one verifies internal consistency and source coverage; stage two, performed by a named senior reviewer outside the originating team, confirms release readiness. Released records are sealed into the archive; any rework is logged in the rejection register and re-entered into stage one.
Each engagement begins with a written scope letter, a conflicts register check and an independence screen. Records that fail any check are not released externally; the failure is logged in the rejection register with a reason code.
Every released record is sealed into the firm's archive with a numbered release identifier and the two named signatures from the independent evidence review. Counterparties can quote the release identifier in their own files; the firm retains the sealed version unchanged for the full retention period defined in the scope letter.
Blockchain and infrastructure evidence rarely sits inside one jurisdiction; see how it is examined and mapped.
Each icon below stands for a defined capability referenced in the firm's method, records, independent evidence review and client-support workflows. The atlas is a single reference view; individual pages surface the subset relevant to their subject.
Take the Case Assessment or speak directly with a Case Manager.