Data protection
UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 alignment.
- ›Lawful basis recorded per data category
- ›Retention periods fixed per case type
- ›Subject-rights request workflow
Digital Asset Claims applies a defined set of technical, evidentiary and data-handling standards, chosen for how they hold up under independent review rather than for how they read in marketing copy.
A recorded lawful basis for every category of personal data handled.
Case data encrypted at rest and in transit, with segregated key custody.
Role-based, time-bound and logged access to case material.
Source material is hashed at collection and the hash travels with the evidence report.
Each standard below is a minimum. Where a case requires more — a stricter chain-of-custody log, an additional corroboration pass — the case scope states so explicitly.
UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 alignment.
Layered technical controls over collection, storage and analysis systems.
Source hashing, chain-of-custody logging and independent review before release.
Short, factual answers stated in the same wording the firm uses in every scope letter, supervisory record and rejection-register entry.
Digital Asset Claims applies a defined set of technical, evidentiary and data-handling standards, chosen for how they hold up under independent review rather than for how they read in marketing copy.
No. Digital Asset Claims is non-custodial. The firm does not take possession of client assets, does not place trades, does not act as a fund administrator and does not move funds on behalf of any party.
No. The firm produces structured documentation only. Investment, tax and legal advice fall outside the permitted activities and are not offered on any page of this site.
Every record passes a independent evidence review. Stage one verifies internal consistency and source coverage; stage two, performed by a named senior reviewer outside the originating team, confirms release readiness. Released records are sealed into the archive; any rework is logged in the rejection register and re-entered into stage one.
Each engagement begins with a written scope letter, a conflicts register check and an independence screen. Records that fail any check are not released externally; the failure is logged in the rejection register with a reason code.
Every released record is sealed into the firm's archive with a numbered release identifier and the two named signatures from the independent evidence review. Counterparties can quote the release identifier in their own files; the firm retains the sealed version unchanged for the full retention period defined in the scope letter.
The written standards below are the ruleset the five-phase method and the review gate are measured against. Follow them into the services where they are applied.
Each icon below stands for a defined capability referenced in the firm's method, records, independent evidence review and client-support workflows. The atlas is a single reference view; individual pages surface the subset relevant to their subject.
Take the Case Assessment or speak directly with a Case Manager.