Digital Asset Claims operates under written internal rules covering independence, data handling and the boundary between investigation and advice, applied to every case file and every analyst.
No affiliation with exchanges, custodians, brokers or advisers whose interests could shape a finding.
Sources, methods and grading decisions are logged against each case.
Controls over collection, retention and destruction of case material.
A second reviewer checks grading and sourcing before a report is released.
The rules below exist to stop a finding from outrunning its evidence — at intake, during analysis and at the point a report leaves the building.
No case is accepted where the firm has a transactional interest in the outcome of the investigation.
Digital Asset Claims does not access systems, accounts, devices or wallets without authorisation, and does not intercept private communications.
The client receives a structured evidence report containing transaction timelines, wallet relationships, transaction identifiers, source references, infrastructure findings, evidence classifications, methodological explanations and a written record of unresolved gaps.
Short, factual answers stated in the same wording the firm uses in every scope letter, supervisory record and rejection-register entry.
Digital Asset Claims operates under written internal rules covering independence, data handling and the boundary between investigation and advice, applied to every case file and every analyst.
No. Digital Asset Claims is non-custodial. The firm does not take possession of client assets, does not place trades, does not act as a fund administrator and does not move funds on behalf of any party.
No. The firm produces structured documentation only. Investment, tax and legal advice fall outside the permitted activities and are not offered on any page of this site.
Every record passes a independent evidence review. Stage one verifies internal consistency and source coverage; stage two, performed by a named senior reviewer outside the originating team, confirms release readiness. Released records are sealed into the archive; any rework is logged in the rejection register and re-entered into stage one.
Each engagement begins with a written scope letter, a conflicts register check and an independence screen. Records that fail any check are not released externally; the failure is logged in the rejection register with a reason code.
Every released record is sealed into the firm's archive with a numbered release identifier and the two named signatures from the independent evidence review. Counterparties can quote the release identifier in their own files; the firm retains the sealed version unchanged for the full retention period defined in the scope letter.
Independence and evidence-register rules described here are enforced at the review gate and in every reported finding.
Each icon below stands for a defined capability referenced in the firm's method, records, independent evidence review and client-support workflows. The atlas is a single reference view; individual pages surface the subset relevant to their subject.
Take the Case Assessment or speak directly with a Case Manager.
